Slasher Studios’ Second Opinion: Clive Barker’s “Hellraiser” (1987)

The original Hellraiser. The one that stands the test of time and actually has a coherent plot with a beginning, middle, and end. A unique, visceral experience written and directed by Clive Barker, based on his own novella “The Hellbound Heart” which I own and read many times [great read, short but effective].

The movie opens somewhere in Asia[?] with Frank, sociopath and sadist, purchasing The Lament Configuration, a puzzle box that once solved apparently opens the door to “endless pleasure” in the pits of heaven or hell, well mostly just Hell. In one memorable scene heavy with symbolism, Frank solves the puzzle only to come face to face with The Cenobites, four “demons to some, angels to others” who indulge in mutilation and torture, aided with the help of chains and hooks that appear out of nowhere, cutting and ripping flesh. In one gruesome sequence we see the Ceneobites playing with the left overs of Frank after his “session”, his face in pieces like a puzzle that female Cenobite has no problem solving. Frank is now a small splash of plasma between the floorboards in the attic of the home he half owns with his brother, Larry, who they inherited from mother.

A couple months later Larry moves into the house with his British, uptight wife Julia, who has some secrets and pent up frustration of her own that we will come to discover. The house isn’t warm and welcoming, and literally reeks of rotten flesh left in the sink, covered in maggots and roaches. Julia isn’t impressed and is even less enthused when Larry’s daughter Kirsty joins them from abroad. After a vile accident involving the tearing of Larry’s hand on protruding nail during moving day, his blood seeps into the floorboards of the attic where it is used to bring Frank back from hell or wherever he was, but only so much that he is still practically a blob of seeping flesh. Here we find out that Julia had an affair with Frank and hasn’t gotten over him ever since, she’s obsessed, and after her minor disgust she agrees to lure men from Singles bars to Frank so he can kill and devour them until he has a completely new body. He better hurry though because thanks to our Hellraiser final Girl Kirsty who is no slouch and has discovered Frank and Julia’s diabolical plan and by accident, crosses paths with the Cenobites and agrees to give Frank to them in exchange for her own life. The Ceneobites don’t take to Frank escaping them too lightly.

A fascinating and macabre horror treat from a truly original mind. This movie is filled with disgusting gore, bodies mutilated, a sludge pile reanimating into some semblance of a human body, and the Ceneobites themselves with all their horrific make-up and design [my fav is Chatterer] but there’s something that sets this apart from just being mind-numbingly disgusting. There is artistry to the gore, it’s actually part of the story and not there just for the sake of being there [leave that to part 3]. The scene where Frank comes back from Larry’s blood is a perfect example of how the gore and effects are thriving art on display. The themes are well thought out and the pace is always on.

The movie just SCREAMS 80S!!! The Christopher Young soundtrack [a class act, I own it], the bluish lighting and Kirsty walking down the street with the wind blowing in her hair, or how about the awesome, intense “stalk” sequence with Frank and Kirsty in the storage room ending with a shot of a rotting face covered in maggots almost making Kirsty scream??? You can only find these endearing qualities in 1980s horror, I swear. I remember the first time I watched this with my mom and sister [I was 9] and I felt lot’s of tension throughout, something all the sequels lacked. There’s an ambiguous subplot involving a homeless man with a liking for munching on live crickets that is very odd and nightmarish, it creeped me out as a kid! This whole movie has many dreamy scenes and nightmarish sound design.

Some complaints would have to be the interpretation of “The Engineer”. Pretty sure it was the budget to blame for that one, it looked nothing like the way described in the book and the creature is easily being spotted as being pushed on a trolley of some sort, very laughable. The finale of Kirsty defeating the Cenobites was rushed and cheap, and we have to put up with one worthless, putrid boyfriend character to Kirsty who looks awful and brings stupidity to the table. Ugh hated him! What a gross and loathsome character,

Overall, a memorable 80s horror treat that oozes with art and imagination, and has some great imagery from frame 1 to end. LOVED the time lapse shots of the flowers on the hospital TV, very cool and backed up by a great editor.

Followed by endless sequels…

–Vince Fontaine

Share:

Pain or Pleasure? Slasher Studios Reviews Clive Barker’s “Hellraiser” (1987)

Throughout my years of watching horror movies I’ve learned a few important rules. If it is a slasher, I will probably love it. If it is an 80’s slasher, I will definitely love it. If it is an 80’s slasher featuring a great Final Girl, it will probably be on my all time favorite horror list. What does all of this have to do with tonight’s film? Everything and nothing at all. Today I will be looking at the Clive Barker tale from 1987 entitled “Hellraiser.” Love Barker or hate him, all bets are off when you are watching one of his films. Remember that rule about the Final Girl? Good, because it is going to come into play later on in this film. You ready to dig into this gory smorgasbord of carnal delights? I know I am.

As “Hellraiser” begins we Frank as he buys an antique puzzle box from a dealer. Back in the attic of his house in London, Frank solves the puzzle box, prompting hooked chains to emerge from it and tear deep into his flesh. Horribly mutilated humanoids appear and attack Frank with hooked chains, tearing him into fleshy pieces. Their leader (Doug Bradley), picks up the box and twists it back into its original state, taking Frank’s dissected physical remains back to their realm with them and restoring the room to normal.

Sometime later, Frank’s brother Larry (sweaty, nasty, and disgustingly played by Andrew Robinson) arrives at the house along with his second wife, Julia (Clare Higgins), who previously had an affair with Frank. Higgins is perfect as the diabolical Julia, an ice queen that we rarely see in horror movies today. There is just something so deliciously English about her that makes her all the more evil. Anyway, the pair know Frank as an avowed hedonist and petty criminal, and, presuming that he is in jail in some exotic location, decide to move in. Larry’s teenage daughter, Kirsty Cotton (a very beautiful and not quite as innocent as she appears Ashley Laurence), chooses not to live with her stepmother and moves into her own place. While moving into the house, Larry cuts his hand on a nail, and drips blood on the attic floor. The blood somehow reaches Frank in his prison in the humanoids’ realm, partially restoring his body and allowing him to escape to the attic.

That night, Julia finds “Frank” in the attic; still obsessed with him after their affair, she agrees to harvest blood for him so that he can fully restore his body and they can run away together. The next day, Julia begins picking up men in bars and bringing them back to the house, where she murders them with a hammer; Frank then consumes their blood and internal organs, progressively regenerating his own body. Once he has regained enough strength, Frank explains to Julia that he had exhausted all sensory experiences and sought out the puzzle box on the promise that it would open a portal to a realm of new carnal pleasures. Instead, it opened up a portal to the realm of the “Cenobites,” who have since taken Frank as their prisoner and subjected him to extreme, sadomasochistic torture. The fun has only just begun….

This film is nasty, repulsive, and quite disturbing. I remember the late Gene Siskel reviewing this film on At the Movies saying the film should have been titled “Skinned Alive” because there is so much bare, naked, tender yet bloody flesh on display. He has a point. For all this film’s disgusting pleasures, it is rarely actually scary. It is more gross than anything else and gross will only take you so far in a horror movie. I admire Barker’s go-for-broke attitude but I wish he developed his “one man’s pain is a another man’s pleasure” theory a bit more thoroughly. For all it’s fans, of which I know there are many, I’ve just never quite understood the appeal of this film. The special effects are great, Laurence makes for an excellent Final Girl with shades of Heather Langenkamp about her, but it never really all adds up to very much.

Share:

Tim’s Slasher Tweet Reviews: “Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers” (1989)

Here is the second half of our Michael Myers double feature from our resident Twitter reviewer Tim Schilling. “Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers” was rushed into production for release less than a year after the very successful “Halloween 4” to negative critical reception and poor box office. Is the film really a diamond in the rough or did it deserve the horrible reception it received?

Thoughts before the film:
Halloween 4 is probably my favorite sequel of the whole series. But, I haven’t seen this one in forever. Maybe that’ll change?

Thoughts while watching:
0:04 Legit, I don’t know why they just don’t chop Michael’s head off. That’ll be the end of him.
0:11 The dog better not die in this one.
0:18 Did something happen Jamie so you can’t talk or did they write that in with no reasoning?
0:21 Wah I liked you Rachel. Your death was pointless, and not even good.
0:28 Half of Halloween Resurrection was basically ripped off of this one.
0:40 I wonder how Michael learned how to drive?
0:45 That did not sound like cookie woman at all.
0:46 Oh okay you can talk again. Why? No reason.
1:01 These cops are so useless.
1:04 Boo editing. Release a movie the way it was meant to be seen.
1:12 I like how Rachel hasn’t even been mentioned since she died. She wasn’t a main character or anything.
1:24 Only this series could make a scene in a laundry vent thing last 5 minutes. At least it’s memorable.
1:24 Memorable as in this scared the crap outta me when younger.
1:25 Screw you. No reason to kill the dog. Completely pointless.
1:26 Danielle Harris is actually really good in this for being so young. She’s a scream queen at heart!
1:30 Dr. Loomis check yourself into an insane asylum.

Final Verdict:
I like how Halloween 4 and Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers were connected. Similar tone, similar sets, but a different story that was a great continuation of the 4th installment, not mentioning some huge and completely random plot holes.

To follow Tim on twitter: https://twitter.com/schillingt
To follow Slasher Studios on twitter: https://twitter.com/slasherstudios

Share:

Tim’s Slasher Tweet Reviews: “Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers” (1988)

We are back with another slasher double feature from our resident Twitter reviewer Tim Schilling. Today he is looking at “Halloween 4” and “Halloween 5”, one of the best loved Halloween sequels and another sequel that most fans would love to forget. Twenty+ years later, how well do these sequels hold up? Let’s dig in and find out if Michael’s knife is as sharp as ever with “Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers.”

Thoughts before the film:
Halloween is probably my least favorite slasher series… Why do I keep coming back to it? #Halloween4

Thoughts while watching:
0:10 I won’t even ask why Michael already has his mask back on, he was only in lockdown for like ten years.
0:17 I wonder how bodies get chewed up from a car crash so much that you can’t tell how many people there were.
0:21 The scene where dr. Loomis is in the gas station. Scared the crap outta me when I was young. I realize I was a big baby.
0:27 Oh no they hit a cow and flipped over! Is 50 First Dates a spin off?
0:29 I feel really bad for Jamie for some reason. She’s too little.
0:35 Dr. Loomis is the one that needs to be locked up I think sometimes.
0:38 El oh el Brady you stupid.
0:40 If the phone just keeps ringing when you call the police… bring out the rednecks.
0:59 Trolololol too bad Michael is already in the house.
1:12 The part where they’re on the roof is pretty intense.
1:24 Jamie you freaking psychopath.

Final Verdict:
Besides the lame beginning, Halloween: The Return of Michael Myers was actually decent. I loved the settings in the movie and the general idea of the story. It also had some very creepy shots of Michael which reminded me when I watched as a kid that scared the crap outta me.

To follow Tim on twitter: https://twitter.com/schillingt
To follow Slasher Studios on twitter: https://twitter.com/slasherstudios

Share:

Mood Over Menace Cinematography Makes For Ingeniously Entertaining “Dust Devil”

The unkillable slasher killer is common sight in horror films after Halloween. The idea of a supernaturally charmed human monster has fueled countless nightmares. Somehow, the utter hopelessness behind the monster is never fully explored.

Dust Devil is a poetic marriage of supernatural horror and slasher films. A living entity of evil, the “dust devil” of the title, haunts a broken and lonely woman in South Africa. The film lowers the body count and slows the story’s pacing to create more moodiness than menace. The gore is graphic, but used sparingly and effectively.

The true cosmic scope of the dust devil’s terror is created with great sets, amazing lighting, and breath-taking cinematography. Director Richard Stanley even creates a terrifying climax in sunny, bright daylight. Some of the scenery, including an abandoned theater in the desert, is completely unique and unforgettable.

The film is far from perfect. The performances from lead actors Robert John Burke and Chelsea Field are a little off (though Burke brings a tremendous physicality to his role as the dust devil). Also, the film has also aged poorly, with shots of a killer in a brown duster and close ups of boots walking down a highway straight out of a book of 90s clichés.

The Internet Movie Database lists several different cuts of the film, so buyer beware. Dust Devil may be closer to a horror Western than to Jason Voorhees, but the unending evil of an unrelenting killer has never been bigger or more threatening. The final girl has never been so alone.

—Axel Kohagen
@mrhorrorpants on Twitter

Share:

Tim’s Slasher Tweet Reviews: “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning” (2006)

We are back with another tweet by tweet review from our twitter reviewer Tim Schilling. Earlier today, he reviewed “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” remake and now he is back taking a look at the prequel. The film did okay at the box office making $40 million on a $17 million but received harsh reviews from most critics who called it unnecessarily grisly. Does it stand up to the remake?

Thoughts before the film:
I liked the remake of TCM, a prequel of a remake is kind of interesting. #TCMTheBeginning

Thoughts while watching:
0:02 She’s having a baby you moron, she’s not dead.
0:13 So the reason behind Leatherface’s killings is cause he couldn’t work at a meat factory?
0:24 What’s with these characters and Mexico in this series?
0:27 Oh no they hit a cow and flipped over! Is 50 First Dates a spin off?
0:32 At least in the remake the sheriff didn’t kill people out of the blue for no reason.
0:45 I’m gonna cut your head off! You just keep sweet talkin me.
0:46 They eat people in the prequel, but not in the remake. What happened? Did they go vegan?
0:54 There’s no way they could have pushed that 752627 pound woman to close the door.
0:56 Leatherface and his freaking meat hooks. Forget about the chainsaw.
1:03 “tell me where the girl is!” as I cover your mouth to stop yelling. Makes sense.
1:11 Isn’t this supposed to be ‘the beginning’? So why is Leatherface know so good at… taking their faces.
1:20 Youre just mad that she found our y’all are inbred.
1:23 These movies need to be renamed to Texas Chainsaw and Jumping out of Windows Massacre.
1:28 That ending was really the only good thing of this movie.

Final Verdict:
For a prequel, Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning was pretty pointless. It hardly gave a reason why this family is so messed up. If you look at is as as just another sequel, it’s basically the same thing as the other movies in the series. Nothing new was brought to it.

To follow Tim on twitter: https://twitter.com/schillingt
To follow Slasher Studios on twitter: https://twitter.com/slasherstudios

Share:

Tim’s Slasher Tweet Reviews: “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” (2003)

Today we bring you a brand new slasher review from our one and only twitter reviewer Tim Schilling. In the first review we bring you today, Tim will be looking at “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” remake. The film received mixed reviews but was a huge commercial success making over $80 million on a $10 million budget. Let’s see nine years later how well this remake holds up to the original classic.

Thoughts before the film:
The original #TexasChainsawMassacre is one of my favorite horror movies. I love the whole series too(3 is the only one I haven’t seen yet).

Thoughts while watching:
0:02 I liked the way they introduced the movie. Very different.
0:07 I want this guy’s van. They’re too freaking cool.
0:16 This old lady ain’t calling the cops.
0:22 That possum had to of been mutant or something.
0:26 This house was definitely a slave house in the past, no question.
0:31 I want pet pigs in my house! Wait I lied.
0:32 No other movie in this series could ever top seeing Leatherface for the first time like they did in the original
0:41 Oh no… Teeth. If I have nightmares about my teeth remember, I will sue.
0:45 Leatherface doesn’t give a crap about the house in every movie. It just gets destroyed all the time.
0:46 The car doesn’t start. Typical.
0:54 There weren’t any bullets in the gun, typical!
1:00 Holy crap, Leatherface is really creepy in this one when he changed faces.
1:01 At least he’s not a screeching transvestite anymore.
1:20 Going to a meat factory in a horror movie is just asking to die.
1:25 Leatherface gets messed up in this movie.
1:28 What’s with people not being able to explain what happened to them? A guy chased me with a chainsaw. Easy.

Final Verdict:
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (remake) wasn’t that bad I don’t think. By the end it got repetitive, but I thought it was a different but good take on the simple story of the original.

To follow Tim on twitter: https://twitter.com/schillingt
To follow Slasher Studios on twitter: https://twitter.com/slasherstudios

Share:

Slasher Studios Presents: Top 5 Favorite Slasher Films

It’s been a couple of weeks but we are back with a brand new episode of Slasher Studios Presents. Slasher Studios Presents is our brand new Youtube horror show in which deliver a top 5 in horror every week! Whether it be the scariest villains, the best slashers, the worst slashers, the best Final Girls, etc. You name it, we will do a show for it. On this week’s episode we are counting down our top 5 favorite slasher films. Enjoy!

Share:

Death of the Day: Debbie Turns Cockroach in “A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master”

We have been so busy with Flashback Weekend and working on finishing Blood Brothers, we haven’t had much time for a really good Death of the Day here at Slasher Studios. Don’t worry slasher fans, the feature is back and we have a great one for you today. Hate bugs? Who doesn’t, right? Well our Death of the Day is Debbie from the underrated “A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master” turning into a cockroach. Yuck! This is the death that used to give me nightmares as a child. I am not a fan of bugs so just imagining turning into a bug just gives me the willies. Freddy gives some of the best death scenes ever and this one truly is the best of the best.

Share:

Worst Stephen King Adaptations: “The Tommyknockers” (1993)

I love Stephen King’s 70s and 80s work so much. It’s well known that King was an alcoholic and cocaine addict right up until the publication of “The TommyKnockers” and that his wife and children had an intervention where she dumped a garbage can filled with remains from his constant abuse on the floor in front of him and declared to get help or get out. He pulled through and some have said since then his work has gotten better and more adult and then you have others [like me] who finds the work decent enough just lacking that vital urgency and depth he penned while intoxicated.

The novel for The Tommyknockers is basically a metaphor for drug and alcohol addiction. Bobbi Anderson and her good old bugle stumble upon hunk of metal protruding from the ground in her backyard and slowly start to dig it up only to find out the metal is a spaceship buried beneath the earth for millions of years and once exposed it gives off something in the air that makes you incredibly intelligent, inventive, and practical, but it comes with a price tag not with $$$ but with your mind and soul and once it has it’s hold on you it’s incredibly hard to quit and they need it to function. Like drugs and booze, the more it takes it’s hold on you the more your health and appearance deteriorate into a monstrosity, here your teeth and hair fall out, your skin becomes transparent, and seaweed like tentacles slither out from your genitals. Something Bobbi and the residents of the small Maine village Haven all soon find out. Bobbi’s lifetime friend and once lover Gard arrives on the scene right as this is all going down and he is a raging alcoholic who, luckily, is immune to the toxic Haven air and tries to save Bobbi before it’s too late. Of course many of the Haven townsfolk have fully embraced the changes and have developed homicidal tendencies that they indulge in with destructive weapons they create, making it all the more harder for Gard to survive.

That is all in the book and is brilliantly written, if not too bloated and even redundant at times. Still it is never boring or unconvincing from page 1 to end and you fully accept and see the stakes that are raised, you care about Gard and Bobbi and see it all as a tragedy with King’s immensely observant opinion on Human stupidity and I gave it *** out of ****.

This mini-series fails miserably as an adaption, and even worse, as just an entertaining product. I’m sure it being made for tv was it’s main flaw and why everything comes off as tacky, undeveloped, and some dire writing. There’s something already ludicrous about the original material and which is why King is such a great writer as he makes you believe whatever it is he’s writing about. Here, everything isn’t translated well at all and instead of being scared or creeped out you have to laugh or groan at such ham-fisted delivery of over the top execution and pathetic horror elements. Everything is so typical and literal. The characters are barely sketched or believable, despite having a very talented cast who have all done much better, before and ever after.

The Tommyknockers mythology and the Why behind them is compromised for typical big head aliens who growl and snarl at the camera while doing nothing else. These are the intelligent creatures that can create anything and have mastered Space Travel? Little more than your average b-movie creatures. The inventions they come up with are mundane and fatuous and raises many questions throughout, bordering on major plot holes big enough to fly a spaceship through.

I love when King creates a town and has the threat, whether it be vampires, aliens, or evil shopkeeper, that slowly but surely overtakes the whole town, it’s always a fun treat to read it all as it enfolds. You really get the sense of history and the ways small communities work, all the more effective when the terror starts. We barely get any sense of that in this turkey. Haven in this adaption is a dead end town with barely any interesting characters in it so who really cares when the aliens invade? Anyone? A perfect example is the pathetic and pitiful Becka Paulson and her plight. Brilliant and depressing in the novel ,here it’s more perfunctory and cliche and you don’t really get any details on it. No one is given any realistic details or memorable dialogue.

The best part I guess is the use of the green light as the presence or toxic poison the spaceship spews into the air. I’d probably prefer to watch the green light splashing around a black screen for 3 hours then watch this again in it’s entirety.

Overall a laughable and contemptible attempt at adapting a King novel that, excuse me for being so cocky, but to me doesn’t seem that hard at all to stay true to the original novel if the right people tried, not people digging the paycheck and submitting whatever low quality trash they first come up with.

If King hasn’t seen it I’d avoid this rubbish as it may break, insult, and depress him and make him want to relapse HARD! It’s that insulting to the original source material.

–Vince Fontaine

Share: